Doctoral thesis in Contemporary History
Supervisor : M. Jean Tulard
University Paris IV - Sorbonne
![]() |
It is first of all necessary to put Prince Victor in context. He was the grandson of King Jerome, Napoleon I's last brother and Catherine Würthemburg. It was to assist the Emperor politically that Jerôme married his second wife Catherine Würthemburg. Together they were to have three children: Prince Jerôme Bonaparte (killed by an illness in 1847), Princess Mathilde and Prince Napoleon-Joseph who, after his brother's death, took the name Jerôme. He was mockingly nicknamed Plon-Plon ('Mr Plod'). During the Second Empire, in 1859, with the aim of furthering Napoleon III's Italian politics, 'Plon Plon' married Princess Marie-Clotilde of Savoy, daughter of Victor-Emmanuel of Savoy and Adélaïde de Habsburg. Three children were born from this union: Victor in 1862, Louis in 1864 and Laetitia in 1866. Prince Victor was therefore the grandson of two Kings, Jerôme King of Westphalia and Victor-Emmanuel, King of Italy from 1861 onwards. |
His prestigious family connections meant that Prince Victor was able to play a political role of the highest importance. As a result of various successions, Prince Victor as last male heir of Napoleon I and his brothers became head of the Imperial house. In fact, King Joseph only had daughters and Louis's (Napoleon III's) line ended in 1879 with the death of the Prince Imperial, hence Jerome Bonaparte ended up the only direct descendent remaining.
On the death of the Prince Imperial, Prince Jerôme should have become the head of the Imperial house. But because of Jerome's reactionary political ideas, the Prince Imperial added a codicil to his will stating that 'the duties of this our house towards this our country should not be cancelled by my death. When I am dead, the task of continuing the work of Napoleon I and Napoleon III falls to the eldest son of Prince Napoleon'. The Prince Imperial therefore passed over Jerome, preferring Victor, and it was a decision which was to have serious repercussions. First of all, the Prince Imperial's codicil caused the breakdown of all relations between Jerôme and his son Victor. Second, at the tender age of eighteen and quite against his will, Prince Victor became the representative of the imperial cause. And he was to remain such until his death in 1926. But despite being the head of the imperial house for forty years, Prince Victor has been almost completely forgotten by history.
Several reasons could be advanced for this. Prince Victor lived in a period when to have the same name as Napoleon I was not necessarily an advantage. The Second Empire had only recently fallen and the defeat of Sedan was still very fresh in people's memories. Furthermore, Prince Victor found himself at the head of the Bonapartist party almost 'by accident', hence he had not been prepared for the job. He was very quickly blocked in any actions he might have taken by the bill of exile, passed by the Third Republic in 1886, which distanced him from his supporters. He never had the time to become known and the Bonapartist party was in full decline.
The almost non-existent bibliography on Prince Victor shows clearly the obscurity into which he has fallen. With the exception of some works of Bonapartist propaganda written on him while he was still alive, no book has ever been written on him. The fullest work, a biography of him written by André Martinet and published in 1895, was written for doctrinal purposes. What is more, being published thirty years before his death it omits almost half of his life. Fortunately particularly detailed archives exist both in Paris and abroad. In Paris there are papers at the Archives Nationales (most of Prince Victor's correspondence, his personal papers and propaganda photos), and at the Archives de la Préfecture de Police, with police reports for the years 1884-1901 (as pretender to the imperial throne, Prince Victor was kept under permanent surveillance). For the years after 1900, there are archives held by the Primoli family in Rome and in the Palais-Royal in Brussels.
The lack of interest in Prince Victor is even more surprising given that biographies have been written on nearly all the other members of the imperial family. It is for this reason that Laeticia de Witt has decided to fill this historical gap and to discover not only who Prince Victor really was but also what was his political role in a period when the Republic had come to stay.
In her thesis, the author intends to approach Prince Victor from three points of view :
| his family and personality; | |
| his political action - Prince Victor's life was conditioned by politics and by what he represented. Politics was the cause of the break with his father, his move to Brussels and hence his marriage to Princess Clémentine of Belgium. | |
| the development of his political action. In other words, his new concept of his Napoleonic heritage - he saw Napoleonic ideology not only as political but also as historical and artistic. Indeed to compensate for the decline of the Bonapartist party, Prince Victor decided to concentrate on one thing which was going to take up his whole life: namely, the development and nurturing of the Napoleonic legend, principally through the building of an outstanding Napoleonic collection. |
![]() |
Laeticia de Witt chose this subject as the extension of her work for her DEA. Her aim is to study Prince Victor with reference to his family interests, using archives to which she has access and which are at present unpublished. |
![]()